Cape fear 1962 part 9 Not entirely true, due to point 1

Cape fear 1962 part 9 Not entirely true, due to point 1 which we both made earlier, they look identical, yet one is cheaper to produce. Why spend more money in manufacturing when you can get the same result with less investment? Wow, where do I begin on this one? I suggest you research engineering and production relative to technology. You do NOT get the same results between HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Again, you seem to imply same results purely from a visual point of view, and sure, they are right on par, but Blu-Ray Disc technology is superior to HD-DVD, hands down. Get over it. Care to explain this? BD is still better is a wonderful explanation as to why one is superior to the other. I dont have the time to do it here, but check a few of my other posts with some info, and do your own research online. While MS supports the HD-DVD format, the XBox wasnt designed to showcase HD-DVDs, Yeah, because they rushed it since their number 1 priority on the 360 business model was to be number 1 out on the market to capture the most market share and beat Sony this time around. This means they sacrificed what they gave YOU, the consumer. For the love of UP. And stop assuming MS did everything they did to give consumer to you had NOTHING to do with it. You got jipped and dont even see it. HD-DVD would provide a much better platform for games on the it now? Forget movies. Now how do you feel about your DVD drive for 400? it was to showcase next-gen games, They DID play their cards right, two formats existed, they didnt know which would win. So they decided to play it safe and not force the technology into the console before it was ready for use, thus moving up their launch date. Read my last post Played it, must be why they paid a certain movie studio 150 Million to stick with HD-DVD not too long you that say MS didnt care which would win need to smell the invested big, and LOST. Business 101? Oh come on now, they have the biggest market share in the next gen console market solely because they launched their console way ahead of the competition. Whether or not they plan on supporting blu-ray in the future via an external drive, they still have three 360s in each household for every single PS That, my friend is business 10 Again, read my last 2 posts above, they sort of answer up business 101 for the 360 a crap under tested system with major flaws, 90 day original warranty a complete joke and only 1/2 next-gen technology. Thats what they did to be Number me go out and buy a 360 right Aeshetics are entirely dependant on the observer, black equiment is boring in my eyes, i like the white. No wrong answer here. Enjoy. In the end I could care less which format wins, Toshiba or Sony. MS cape fear 1962 part 9 be a backer of HD-DVD but their investment cape fear 1962 part 9 the format is not near as great as either Toshiba or Sony has into their formats. Mainly the point Ive been trying to make here. If HD-DVD fails, MS doesnt sell their accessory item for the xbox, the impact of this pales in the savings they made earlier on when they chose to wait it out. The two formats are more than comparable. A bit of marketing thrown here and there can make one seem superior than the other. Citing possible layer increases in the future is something either can do. Yeah, right. Again, the MS 150 Million incentive dont care which wins huh? Wrong, they do care.